Yesterday the CBA released the September mortgage arrears figures and… cue the broken record… they’re up. The Alberta rate now stands at 0.67%, drawing ever closer to our record high (0.69%), up from 0.34% a year earlier and 0.65% in August.
Nationally the rate held at 0.43%, and Manitoba swapped places with Saskatchewan for the lowest rate in the country (0.26% and 0.28% respectively). Alberta continues to widen it’s lead at the opposite end of the spectrum, while the Atlantic provinces are next worst at 0.49%. B.C. and Quebec were both up a tick at 0.37% and 0.36% respectively, and finally Ontario held at 0.43%.
In an effort to freshen things up, I did some digging and found some comparable numbers from the US. These are from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (I’m sure you’ve heard those names, they operate something like the CMHC does in Canada for those unfamiliar with them).
These graphs are of their “serious delinquencies,” which are those that fall three months or more behind on their mortgages… so, virtually exactly the same as our much discussed “mortgage arrears.” They have three different figures respectively, credit enhanced, non-credit enhanced, and total.
Afraid I’m not intimately familiar with exactly where the line is between credit enhanced and non, or how these relates to the CBA figures (I think we can safely assume from the data ‘credit enhanced’ are likely those with less then stellar credit ratings) … so for our comparisons between countries I’ll include both the total and non-credit enhanced figures and let you interpret the data for yourself.
Here we have them all charted together. We can see that traditionally non-credit enhanced US figures are very close to those we enjoy here in Canada and Alberta, while the total figures track about a half point higher (at least until their bubble burst).
While the national numbers are only starting to creep up here in Canada, the Alberta figures are tracking a pattern quite similar to those in the US 18 months earlier. Now, that doesn’t mean we’ll end up as bad off as they are down south, but it’s worth noting the similarities… so it’s not out of the question that we could be on the same road. It was also around that time that phrases like “foreclosure epidemic” really started to make the rounds.
Bear in mind, these are national numbers in the US, and foreclosure problems vary greatly amongst regions/states. I’m going to try to find some state numbers for future months… but looking at the magnitude of the change in the US as a whole leaves little doubt that foreclosures have become a national issue.
Fannie and Freddie have changed what they’ve reported periodically, so the best I could piece together for a longer term comparison is their total figures. It’s interesting to note here their total delinquency figures were quite close to the Canadian equivalent up until ’01-’02. Why and how it’s difficult to say, could be anything from a change in lending practises, to a change in methodology.
In any case, what I think we should take away from this is that before we get cocky about how low our level is currently in comparison, remember, it was not even two years ago they were right where we are now… and we’ve had a ringside seat to witness that slippery slope.














Obviously you don't feel that real estate is a good place to put money right now, but where do you think is a good place? I'm trying to get into investing, but it seems like it's a crap shoot everywhere, either that really crappy returns
That's a tough question, it's a volatile time, and I don't really like giving specific investment advice at the best of times. Truth be told most of my money is sitting on the sidelines earning next to nothing. I still have some gold I bought about a year ago, but I even sold some of that a couple weeks back to hedge my gains thinking it's rally may be playing out, but it's just kept going.
In a market like this there are no sure bets, now more then ever.
September bankruptcy figures are out, and by my unofficial calculations the national rate is at a modern day high (they've only kept track of this since 1991). Alberta is still below their prior high, but climbing too.
http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/bsf-osb.nsf/eng/br02300.html#tbl2
How come your US data is so far below this 14% figure cited in the G&M?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/us-foreclosures-hit-fixed-rate-home-loans/article1370163/
The numbers I cited are only those 90+ days in arrears, as that is what the Canadian figures are of.
That 14% number you cite, includes those that are 30, 60, 90 and in the foreclosure process, as you can see here http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/11/mortgage-delinquencies-and-foreclosures.html
I'll attach the second graph from that post as it provides an excellent breakdown, and there you can see the 90 day numbers from the MBA are very close to those from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac