Archive for 2010


Wow, this year has just flown by. It’s already that most holy of holidays, that’s right, Festivus! I bet you all have been good little boys and girls, so come on up and get your presents… not so fast, Ernst & Young, you got some ‘splainin’ to do!

I was thinking of doing a “Naughty and Nice” list, an airing of grievances if you will, but that sounds like a lot of work, and I have a Christmas party to get to. The punch bowl isn’t going to spike itself, and without that my creepily hanging out underneath the mistletoe later in the night awkward and lonely. Hard work, but someone’s gotta do it. Instead I come bearing gift, an update on the mortgage arrears numbers. I know, I know, it’s not a Best Buy gift card, but it’s better than socks!

Mortgage Arrears

As you can see, we’ve hit yet another new high. Eclipsed the 0.80% mark even. Up from 0.78% last month, and 0.69% a year ago. Cue the chorus, we’re still WAY above the national average of 0.43%, or even the next highest regions, which is a position shared by B.C. and the Atlantic Provinces. Our eastern and western extremes might not have a whole lot in common, but they do share an 0.45% arrears rate.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, Manitoba continues to enjoy the lowest rate in the country at 0.29%. As Manitoba has largely remained unscathed by the housing foolishness that much the rest of Canada has experienced the last few years, I suspect they’ll hold that position for a long while. Saskatchewan comes in at 0.31%, good for second, but they are starting to creep up, and I suspect we will see that rise a fair bit as they’ve had quite a bubble of their own, nominally maybe not as large as ours, but proportionately maybe even larger.

And just for good measure, Ontario and Quebec reside in the middle, and both sit at 0.35%.

So, I’ll send you off on your holidays with that. Hope you’re done your Christmas shopping, or are at least ready for a good scrap for what’s left. I knocked mine out in a mere couple hours last Friday. Fortunately being a young single guy, I enjoy low expectations when it comes to presents. In other words, liquor and gift cards for everyone! I may be lame, but at least I’m self aware.

If you get a chance tonight (or better yet, fire up the PVR), check out a little flick on Movie Central called “Coopers Camera”… it’s a riot of a Christmas movie. It’ll send you into the horror of a weeks worth of family get togethers with a smile on your face, especially those other children of the 70′s/80′s out there! Be warned though, this isn’t one for the kiddies. Happy holidays everyone!

Papa Bear

Mark Carney

Oh my! Papa Bear! Mark Carney!

It’s been quite a week for BoC Governor Mark Carney. He’s been all over the news, and dropping science faster than a theater major! Came out earlier in the week and told Canadians point blank they had too damn much debt and needed to tighten their belts. Given the timing, most Canadians probably think he was making a last ditch audition for the role of the Grinch. I’m sure that was music to the ears of retailers in particular.

For those of us who recognized this was happening years back, it probably doesn’t seem like much. But we need to read between the lines, and remember that for someone in as political a position as his, to come out with such strong words as he did is no small concession. One can only imagine the words being tossed around behind closed doors. After all, this is a bunch who wouldn’t say “shit” if you took one in their $800 Italian loafers. And it is prose like that which so aptly displays why my foray into public relations was a misguided as it was brief.

Debt to GDP and Disposable Income

But enough of the hyperbole, lets take a look at the data and see what Marky-Mark was talkin’ about (and don’t think that’s not a photoshop that is being worked on). The 3Q National Balance Sheet Accounts data was released Monday, and it was ugly. You may recall back in September some dumbasses were speculating that Canadians appetite for debt may finally be waning.

Upon further review… yeah… not so much.

After the debt-to-disposable income ratio apparently dipping in the spring, the preliminary numbers show that was merely an aberration as come summer we were right back on course, and have now eclipsed the 150% mark, coming in at 150.19%. After the ratio took it’s biggest quarter-to-quarter drop ever in 2Q, it took it’s biggest jump ever in Q3. In the twenty years that data has been kept the quarter-to-quarter fluctuation had only eclipsed 3% two times, and just barely… so that our jump this quarter damn near hitting 5% is no small feat (4.82% to be exact).

The debt-to-GDP figure also continues to climb, albeit more gradually. The preliminary 3Q numbers coming in at an all time high of 94.04%. So it doesn’t seem that we’ve maxed out yet. We’ve now surpassed the comparative U.S. figures, as since their housing market went bust they’ve seen their ratios fall off. At the peak down south their debt-to-disposable-income was close to 160% (their calculations are slightly different, so we’re ballparking it).

In any case, we haven’t been heeding the warnings thus far, and Carney has been one of the few the last couple years telling people to reign it in. We’re also starting to hear rumblings again from the big banks, apparently wanting the Feds to tighten mortgage lending rules even more, perhaps even so far as going back to 25 year amortizations and requiring 10% down payments. In this internet blowhards opinion that would be a great move for the government to make, but this is the same bunch that stripped them to the bone in the first place.

Hope everyone is dug out and/or warm and toasty here in the early days of the holiday season. Everyone at work seems to have largely finished their holiday shopping weeks ago, but as still stressed out with just a couple remaining people to buy for. With almost two weeks left I don’t know why, I don’t even start for at least another week. But then again, I’m guy, and at an age and with a group of friends who are more than happy with receiving bottles of alcohol as presents. Who cares about the thought and effort put in when you can get blasted?!

Thought we’d do something a little different today, and take a look at incomes relative to the exchange rate. The Canadian economy in general, and Alberta in particular, rely heavily on our trade relationship with the United States. So as the exchange rate swings, it can have a massive effect on the viability of projects for foreign entities. For most of my life, in other words the early-80′s on, the exchange rate had typically fluctuated between about 65-85 cents on the dollar.

But that changed in 2007, when suddenly the Canadian dollar gained a great deal of strength, and made a big push towards (and even past) par. It feel off a bit in late ’08, but is now back close to par again. So today I figured we could look at how this has effected the cost of doing business in the province for foreign entities, insofar as incomes are concerned.

Incomes and Exchange Rate

We know incomes have risen of late in the province, and not just nominally. And we can see this in the graph above with the blue (Edmonton) and yellow (Calgary) lines. Those two are the median family incomes in Canadian dollars, and are inflation adjusted to 2008 dollars. Because income data takes awhile to get processed we don’t have data any more recent than 2008, but that isn’t a big deal for our purposes today.

The gist of what I’m going to point out today comes from the green and red lines (very festive in an unintentional way), and how they have moved relative to the blue and yellow lines. Those (red and green lines) are derived from the same data, but are converted to US dollars. Here we can see that the cost of doing business in the province has appreciated considerably in the last 15 years, in fact it’s practically doubled over the period. And I remind you again, that isn’t just nominally, that is inflation adjusted.

So, if you were wondering why at one time oil hitting $60 was boom times just a few years ago, but now it’s at $90 and we’re just treading water… that’s why. Well, that and natural gas has been the real commodity driver of the economy, and it’s prices are still low. A double whammy figuring in the exchange rate hovering around par. The cost of labour here has exploded for US companies, and it’s not even really the actual salaries as the exchange rate that’s kills them.

Or maybe you disagree? Food for thought anyway, and something to widdle away your working hours with on a Monday.

Continuing to catch up on stories I couldn’t cover during the internet dark ages last month… the latest financials from Boardwalk came out, and with them some quarterly stats on the markets they serve. And after a quick look-see, it would seem the theme of the 3rd quarter of two-odd-ten.

Average Rents

On the rents front, not a whole lot changed it seems. Occupied rents were virtually unchanged, while market rents (asking prices) tracked up a tad. Market rents for Boardwalk in Calgary now stand at $1152, while in Edmonton they are $1050. Compared to the rest of Boardwalks portfolio around the country, in B.C. it’s $1049, in Saskatchewan $1028, $970 in Quebec, and $787 in Ontario.

Vacancy Rates

Vacancy wise, Edmonton has stayed pretty consistent at 3%… Calgary is a tad lower, and a bit more volatile and as October sits at 2.6%. So Boardwalk continues to enjoy vacancy rates significantly lower in these markets then other rental outlets. Though that is not surprising, as with a much larger and established collection of properties they are much quicker to notice market conditions and respond accordingly.

Who knew bitter temperatures were a recipe for a sales surge?! Calling it a “surge” may be a bit much, but after several months well below average they the climbed close to the mean in November and come in at 1,120. Evidently the writer of the EREB’s press release didn’t look terribly close at their actual stats, as they seemed to think sales were 1,220, and ran with it. But whatcha gonna do? Never let looking bad get in the way of a good narrative I guess.

Edmonton Sales

After they are revised and whatnot I imagine the final number will come in around 1,200, which would put it in the normal range for November historically. I guess the other item of note is that this was actually higher than in October, an unusual occurrence given typical seasonality, but not unheard of. Now, if December’s numbers come in higher than November, that will be unheard of…

Edmonton SFH Price
Edmonton Condo Price

Prices were a bit of a mixed bag. The SFH median was up five grand from October, while the condo median remained the same. Both are down about 1% from a year ago, but significantly more from six months ago, in fact the condo median is down more than 7%. So we’ll be seeing continued fluctuation heading into the winter.

Despite the strength in medians, average were down. Condo’s over $6K and SFH’s over $3K from October. Interestingly the overall residential average actually rose, which tells us there was a big swing in sales mix with a big increase in sales in SFH’s and away from condos. No surprise these are both down significantly from a year ago.

Edmonton Inventory
Edmonton Inventory Change

Inventory continued it’s seasonal slide, and is now a touch below 7,000. We can expect a massive drop next month as the calendar year end also marks the typical wave of delistings from the market, which will come back online as the new year unfolds. I guess we can start putting our money down on how big the drop will be next month, I’m gonna say 1,500+, but it might be a little less as we have seen listings drop off a little faster than usual for the summer/fall.

Finally, and as always, here are the hard numbers:

Sales* = 1,120
Since two years ago = +24.4% (+220)
Since one year ago = -9.5% (-118)
Since last month = +4.0% (+43)

Active Listings = 6,982
Since two years ago = -12.9% (-1,033)
Since one year ago = +33.6% (+1,756)
Since last month = -9.2% (-707)

Single Family Homes Median* = $350,000
Since peak (May ’07) = -12.5% (-$50,000)
Since one year ago = -1.1% (-$3,900)
Since six months ago = -3.6% (-$13,000)
Since last month = +1.4% (+$5,000)

Condo Median* = $218,000
Since peak (July ’07) = -17.7% (-$47,000)
Since one year ago = -0.9% (-$2,000)
Since six months ago = -7.4% (-$17,500)
Since last month = 0.0% ($0)

Residential Average* = $319,479
Since peak (July ’07) = -10.3% (-$36,660)
Since one year ago = -1.4% (-$4,649)
Since six months ago = -6.1% (-$20,713)
Since last month = +0.6% (+$2,057)

Single Family Homes Average* = $362,657
Since peak (May ’07) = -14.5% (-$61,743)
Since one year ago = -2.5% (-$9,241)
Since six months ago = -7.1% (-$27,926)
Since last month = -0.8% (-$3,034)

Condo Average* = $229,603
Since peak (July ’07) = -16.3% (-$44,776)
Since one year ago = -3.0% (-$7,049)
Since six months ago = -7.6% (-$18,923)
Since last month = -2.7% (-$6,291)

* Preliminary data, subject to revision

The CBA rolled out their September mortgage arrears figures this week. Seems they may be plotting to perhaps reverse course again, as while they were technically up, it was only by a trace amount. For all intents and purposes it remained effectively unchanged from August in Alberta, at a national high of 0.78% (up from 0.67% a year ago).

Arrears

Seems to be much the story all across this land on Grey Cup Sunday, as most regions remained unchanged, or at most were up/down no more than 0.01%. Nationally the rate remained at 0.42% for the 5th consecutive month, which is down 0.01% from a year ago. We won’t get into all the provinces numbers this time around, you can read the linked to report for your self should you be so inclined.

Instead, to shake things up a little bit I’m going to take a look at the numbers from a bit of a different angle today for Alberta. Rather than just report the rate, we’ll look at the two numbers that compose said rate, the number of mortgages outstanding, and those in arrears… and specifically, how they change year-over-year.

Total Mortgages and Total Mortgage Arrears

We can only go back as far as 2004 for this, as while the CBA has numbers going back to 1990, the number of institutions reporting has increased over time, and thus when a major one comes online this of course causes a major skewing of the nominal numbers. It’s not a big issue with the rate itself though, as you would expect the new numbers to somewhat fall in line with the previously reporting institutions.

As it doesn’t look like they’ve had any major changes in this regard since mid-2002, we can thus report the numbers from mid-2003 on, but just for presentation purposes we’ll start at January, 2004. Unfortunately for us this doesn’t provide us with a baseline number, as by 2004 the housing market was already starting to amp up, but what ya gonna do?!

Hard to draw any definite conclusions from that graph, but we can see some general trends around the times that the arrears totals start changing course. First we see it in early ’07, as the growth in number of mortgages starts to fall off prior levels, and the number of arrears starts to head up (granted it’s still very much negative at this point.

Eventually arrears hits positive territory, and continues growing until early ’09… and we all know what happens then to interest rates, and the responding goosing of the housing market. At this point mortgage numbers again start trending up, and arrears growth plateaus, and eventually reverses course and starts dropping off.

This was the sort of behavior I was looking for in the rate itself but didn’t really surface. Arrears just by it’s nature is something of a lagging indicator, and it appears that trends and momentum in the underlying figures may play a larger role in deciding the actual rate than I expected. Making it something of a lagging indicator or a lagging indicator if you will.

From here on out perhaps I should start checking in on that year-over-year nominal change in mortgage arrears, it seems to be a bit better barometer for the mood of the market than the arrears rate.

Sales Totals

Alrighty, then… lets get back on the horse. The revised October numbers are out, and it looks like things continue to be tight out there, with just 1,154 homes trading hands last month. That is the lowest total since 2000 when 1,122 moved. This is obviously way down from last year when the novelty of interest rates were still goosing the market and there were 1,535 sales.

Sales Seasonality

Seasonally, we continue to track about one standard deviation below where where YTD sales predict we should be… and this is typically when we start seeing sales really fall off going into the November and December. It’ll be interesting to see if the dismal weather that’s hit the last week might effect things further, it’ll certainly scare off the tire kickers, but those people aren’t really buying anyway.

Should we stay on this clip it’s now looking like we’ll definitely come in under 16,000 sales for the year, and likely have the third lowest annual tally since Y2K. Come spring sellers could be getting a little antsy, but I don’t see any relief coming for them.

Sales YTD

Quick look at the YTD totals compared to historically. After a fast start sales have really dwindled and we’re now sitting with the fourth lowest YTD-through-October since 2000, and 2001 will likely nip us when November and December are figured in.

Absorption Rate

And finally absorption rate… it’s high, and apparently demonic, with 6.66 months of inventory on the market. This is down a shade from September, and from the 2010 high of 6.87 hit in August… but obviously still WAY above normal.

Broke your interweb

After 26 loooooong days, hours on hold, no-show installers and multiple ISP’s… I’m finally back online. What a nightmare, but finally Telus came riding to the rescue (there is a statement I never thought I’d make). Shaw, and I don’t say this off the cuff, I mean it from the bottom of my heart, go fuck yourselves. Really. With a wire brush even.

Anyway, enough of that diatribe. Just writing to apologize for the lack of posts the last month, and to give you guys a heads up that I’ll be making up for lost time the next couple weeks and post up a storm. I’d like to thank you guys for sticking around, and I’m going to make it up to you. I’ll have something fresh up tomorrow night.

Round 2

With the ink still yet to dry on their recent settlement, it seems the Competition Bureau isn’t done with the CREA, word is already making the rounds that they are aiming to take another bite at the MLS apple.

Last time around they wanted to open up listing capacity to a la carte services, now they apparently want access to historical stats that the database collects. Details are still pretty sketchy as to just what this challenge may entail, but it would seem that they want to increase public availability to historical sales data that could previously only be obtained through the services of an agent, and perhaps open the door to services such as Zillow like in the states.

Obviously the potential of access to such data would be practically a wet dream for a stats geek like me… and while I would love it, my take on it is that I’m not really sure the CREA is under any legal or moral obligation to share that data with the public, much less beyond what they already do in many markets with their monthly releases.

Beyond that, virtually all their historical data can already be had… for a price (second and third from the bottom). A fairly steep one, which is I don’t have it on this site…but if any of you readers are willing to part with six grand to buy me access, I’d be more than willing to take it!

Truth be told, I’ve managed to scour pretty much all the data I want exclusively from free sources, and actually quite enjoy the hunt as far as that goes. But I suppose as far as that goes, my interests as a blogger differ significantly from the general public interest for such information, which I would presume to be largely limited to accurately pricing their homes. At which point one would need neighborhood specific data, which is only currently available either through an agent, or via the Conference Board’s CREA II database for a tidy $6025 (a year).

So, after much meandering, and as much as I’d love to get my hands on such data… I’m not really sure how much merit such a challenge really has. Of course the rules change when you’re dealing with a monopoly, which the MLS pretty much is in a de facto sense, which is probably why the Competition Bureau is pursuing the matter, but even at that, I’m not really sold. But I’m also not a lawyer, so who really knows?

It’ll be interesting to see how this develops. Perhaps we could see some positive steps, like standardized reporting of data across the country, but at this point the fight seems to be about something other than what we stats geeks may consider to be of primary interest.

The CBA pumped out another update on arrears while I wasn’t looking… and as of August they’re up again, now sitting at 0.78%, the highest level on record. This is up 0.02% from July, and 0.13% from a year ago.

Arrears

Seems consumer sentiment shifting again in the spring may have gotten us back on our earlier trajectory after the little reprieve in the aftermath of central banks collapsing prime rates.

In contrast, Nationally the rate held for the forth consecutive month at 0.42%, down from 0.43% a year ago. Another interesting development is that B.C. is just about to overtake the Atlantic region for the second highest rate in the country (behind Alberta), they are both listed at 0.45%, but B.C. is still a tad lower when we go to further decimal places.

Quebec remains at 0.35%, while Ontario is down a tick to 0.36%, and Saskatchewan is up a tick to 0.30%. Manitoba remains the lowest in Canada at 0.27%, up from 0.26% in July, but unchanged from a year ago.