Archive for December, 2010


Wow, this year has just flown by. It’s already that most holy of holidays, that’s right, Festivus! I bet you all have been good little boys and girls, so come on up and get your presents… not so fast, Ernst & Young, you got some ‘splainin’ to do!

I was thinking of doing a “Naughty and Nice” list, an airing of grievances if you will, but that sounds like a lot of work, and I have a Christmas party to get to. The punch bowl isn’t going to spike itself, and without that my creepily hanging out underneath the mistletoe later in the night awkward and lonely. Hard work, but someone’s gotta do it. Instead I come bearing gift, an update on the mortgage arrears numbers. I know, I know, it’s not a Best Buy gift card, but it’s better than socks!

Mortgage Arrears

As you can see, we’ve hit yet another new high. Eclipsed the 0.80% mark even. Up from 0.78% last month, and 0.69% a year ago. Cue the chorus, we’re still WAY above the national average of 0.43%, or even the next highest regions, which is a position shared by B.C. and the Atlantic Provinces. Our eastern and western extremes might not have a whole lot in common, but they do share an 0.45% arrears rate.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, Manitoba continues to enjoy the lowest rate in the country at 0.29%. As Manitoba has largely remained unscathed by the housing foolishness that much the rest of Canada has experienced the last few years, I suspect they’ll hold that position for a long while. Saskatchewan comes in at 0.31%, good for second, but they are starting to creep up, and I suspect we will see that rise a fair bit as they’ve had quite a bubble of their own, nominally maybe not as large as ours, but proportionately maybe even larger.

And just for good measure, Ontario and Quebec reside in the middle, and both sit at 0.35%.

So, I’ll send you off on your holidays with that. Hope you’re done your Christmas shopping, or are at least ready for a good scrap for what’s left. I knocked mine out in a mere couple hours last Friday. Fortunately being a young single guy, I enjoy low expectations when it comes to presents. In other words, liquor and gift cards for everyone! I may be lame, but at least I’m self aware.

If you get a chance tonight (or better yet, fire up the PVR), check out a little flick on Movie Central called “Coopers Camera”… it’s a riot of a Christmas movie. It’ll send you into the horror of a weeks worth of family get togethers with a smile on your face, especially those other children of the 70′s/80′s out there! Be warned though, this isn’t one for the kiddies. Happy holidays everyone!

Papa Bear

Mark Carney

Oh my! Papa Bear! Mark Carney!

It’s been quite a week for BoC Governor Mark Carney. He’s been all over the news, and dropping science faster than a theater major! Came out earlier in the week and told Canadians point blank they had too damn much debt and needed to tighten their belts. Given the timing, most Canadians probably think he was making a last ditch audition for the role of the Grinch. I’m sure that was music to the ears of retailers in particular.

For those of us who recognized this was happening years back, it probably doesn’t seem like much. But we need to read between the lines, and remember that for someone in as political a position as his, to come out with such strong words as he did is no small concession. One can only imagine the words being tossed around behind closed doors. After all, this is a bunch who wouldn’t say “shit” if you took one in their $800 Italian loafers. And it is prose like that which so aptly displays why my foray into public relations was a misguided as it was brief.

Debt to GDP and Disposable Income

But enough of the hyperbole, lets take a look at the data and see what Marky-Mark was talkin’ about (and don’t think that’s not a photoshop that is being worked on). The 3Q National Balance Sheet Accounts data was released Monday, and it was ugly. You may recall back in September some dumbasses were speculating that Canadians appetite for debt may finally be waning.

Upon further review… yeah… not so much.

After the debt-to-disposable income ratio apparently dipping in the spring, the preliminary numbers show that was merely an aberration as come summer we were right back on course, and have now eclipsed the 150% mark, coming in at 150.19%. After the ratio took it’s biggest quarter-to-quarter drop ever in 2Q, it took it’s biggest jump ever in Q3. In the twenty years that data has been kept the quarter-to-quarter fluctuation had only eclipsed 3% two times, and just barely… so that our jump this quarter damn near hitting 5% is no small feat (4.82% to be exact).

The debt-to-GDP figure also continues to climb, albeit more gradually. The preliminary 3Q numbers coming in at an all time high of 94.04%. So it doesn’t seem that we’ve maxed out yet. We’ve now surpassed the comparative U.S. figures, as since their housing market went bust they’ve seen their ratios fall off. At the peak down south their debt-to-disposable-income was close to 160% (their calculations are slightly different, so we’re ballparking it).

In any case, we haven’t been heeding the warnings thus far, and Carney has been one of the few the last couple years telling people to reign it in. We’re also starting to hear rumblings again from the big banks, apparently wanting the Feds to tighten mortgage lending rules even more, perhaps even so far as going back to 25 year amortizations and requiring 10% down payments. In this internet blowhards opinion that would be a great move for the government to make, but this is the same bunch that stripped them to the bone in the first place.

Hope everyone is dug out and/or warm and toasty here in the early days of the holiday season. Everyone at work seems to have largely finished their holiday shopping weeks ago, but as still stressed out with just a couple remaining people to buy for. With almost two weeks left I don’t know why, I don’t even start for at least another week. But then again, I’m guy, and at an age and with a group of friends who are more than happy with receiving bottles of alcohol as presents. Who cares about the thought and effort put in when you can get blasted?!

Thought we’d do something a little different today, and take a look at incomes relative to the exchange rate. The Canadian economy in general, and Alberta in particular, rely heavily on our trade relationship with the United States. So as the exchange rate swings, it can have a massive effect on the viability of projects for foreign entities. For most of my life, in other words the early-80′s on, the exchange rate had typically fluctuated between about 65-85 cents on the dollar.

But that changed in 2007, when suddenly the Canadian dollar gained a great deal of strength, and made a big push towards (and even past) par. It feel off a bit in late ’08, but is now back close to par again. So today I figured we could look at how this has effected the cost of doing business in the province for foreign entities, insofar as incomes are concerned.

Incomes and Exchange Rate

We know incomes have risen of late in the province, and not just nominally. And we can see this in the graph above with the blue (Edmonton) and yellow (Calgary) lines. Those two are the median family incomes in Canadian dollars, and are inflation adjusted to 2008 dollars. Because income data takes awhile to get processed we don’t have data any more recent than 2008, but that isn’t a big deal for our purposes today.

The gist of what I’m going to point out today comes from the green and red lines (very festive in an unintentional way), and how they have moved relative to the blue and yellow lines. Those (red and green lines) are derived from the same data, but are converted to US dollars. Here we can see that the cost of doing business in the province has appreciated considerably in the last 15 years, in fact it’s practically doubled over the period. And I remind you again, that isn’t just nominally, that is inflation adjusted.

So, if you were wondering why at one time oil hitting $60 was boom times just a few years ago, but now it’s at $90 and we’re just treading water… that’s why. Well, that and natural gas has been the real commodity driver of the economy, and it’s prices are still low. A double whammy figuring in the exchange rate hovering around par. The cost of labour here has exploded for US companies, and it’s not even really the actual salaries as the exchange rate that’s kills them.

Or maybe you disagree? Food for thought anyway, and something to widdle away your working hours with on a Monday.

Continuing to catch up on stories I couldn’t cover during the internet dark ages last month… the latest financials from Boardwalk came out, and with them some quarterly stats on the markets they serve. And after a quick look-see, it would seem the theme of the 3rd quarter of two-odd-ten.

Average Rents

On the rents front, not a whole lot changed it seems. Occupied rents were virtually unchanged, while market rents (asking prices) tracked up a tad. Market rents for Boardwalk in Calgary now stand at $1152, while in Edmonton they are $1050. Compared to the rest of Boardwalks portfolio around the country, in B.C. it’s $1049, in Saskatchewan $1028, $970 in Quebec, and $787 in Ontario.

Vacancy Rates

Vacancy wise, Edmonton has stayed pretty consistent at 3%… Calgary is a tad lower, and a bit more volatile and as October sits at 2.6%. So Boardwalk continues to enjoy vacancy rates significantly lower in these markets then other rental outlets. Though that is not surprising, as with a much larger and established collection of properties they are much quicker to notice market conditions and respond accordingly.

Who knew bitter temperatures were a recipe for a sales surge?! Calling it a “surge” may be a bit much, but after several months well below average they the climbed close to the mean in November and come in at 1,120. Evidently the writer of the EREB’s press release didn’t look terribly close at their actual stats, as they seemed to think sales were 1,220, and ran with it. But whatcha gonna do? Never let looking bad get in the way of a good narrative I guess.

Edmonton Sales

After they are revised and whatnot I imagine the final number will come in around 1,200, which would put it in the normal range for November historically. I guess the other item of note is that this was actually higher than in October, an unusual occurrence given typical seasonality, but not unheard of. Now, if December’s numbers come in higher than November, that will be unheard of…

Edmonton SFH Price
Edmonton Condo Price

Prices were a bit of a mixed bag. The SFH median was up five grand from October, while the condo median remained the same. Both are down about 1% from a year ago, but significantly more from six months ago, in fact the condo median is down more than 7%. So we’ll be seeing continued fluctuation heading into the winter.

Despite the strength in medians, average were down. Condo’s over $6K and SFH’s over $3K from October. Interestingly the overall residential average actually rose, which tells us there was a big swing in sales mix with a big increase in sales in SFH’s and away from condos. No surprise these are both down significantly from a year ago.

Edmonton Inventory
Edmonton Inventory Change

Inventory continued it’s seasonal slide, and is now a touch below 7,000. We can expect a massive drop next month as the calendar year end also marks the typical wave of delistings from the market, which will come back online as the new year unfolds. I guess we can start putting our money down on how big the drop will be next month, I’m gonna say 1,500+, but it might be a little less as we have seen listings drop off a little faster than usual for the summer/fall.

Finally, and as always, here are the hard numbers:

Sales* = 1,120
Since two years ago = +24.4% (+220)
Since one year ago = -9.5% (-118)
Since last month = +4.0% (+43)

Active Listings = 6,982
Since two years ago = -12.9% (-1,033)
Since one year ago = +33.6% (+1,756)
Since last month = -9.2% (-707)

Single Family Homes Median* = $350,000
Since peak (May ’07) = -12.5% (-$50,000)
Since one year ago = -1.1% (-$3,900)
Since six months ago = -3.6% (-$13,000)
Since last month = +1.4% (+$5,000)

Condo Median* = $218,000
Since peak (July ’07) = -17.7% (-$47,000)
Since one year ago = -0.9% (-$2,000)
Since six months ago = -7.4% (-$17,500)
Since last month = 0.0% ($0)

Residential Average* = $319,479
Since peak (July ’07) = -10.3% (-$36,660)
Since one year ago = -1.4% (-$4,649)
Since six months ago = -6.1% (-$20,713)
Since last month = +0.6% (+$2,057)

Single Family Homes Average* = $362,657
Since peak (May ’07) = -14.5% (-$61,743)
Since one year ago = -2.5% (-$9,241)
Since six months ago = -7.1% (-$27,926)
Since last month = -0.8% (-$3,034)

Condo Average* = $229,603
Since peak (July ’07) = -16.3% (-$44,776)
Since one year ago = -3.0% (-$7,049)
Since six months ago = -7.6% (-$18,923)
Since last month = -2.7% (-$6,291)

* Preliminary data, subject to revision