The January resale numbers came out today… and you know it’s bad when they are looking to Winter ’09 for a comparison other for sales levels. You may remember the 1Q of ’09 was dismal for sales, the worst this Millenia in fact, but of course no mention of that in their schlep. I guess context doesn’t help shine a turd.
The preliminary sales tally comes in at 735. We can expect the revision to be in the 770-790 range… so we may or may not top January ’09′s rather dismal total. In any case, ’tis ugly. Even down from December in fact, though that’s not entirely unusual, and actually also mirrors the inventory situation to a degree. Apparently both buyers and sellers are playing it close to the vest.
Like I mentioned, and as we can now see, inventory is also down… though barely, and obviously nothing like December. This too isn’t all that unusual for January, the listings don’t usually start to flood back until March/April. Going back to the boom years, we can see in 2006 inventory didn’t start growing until August of that year (well, it was +2 in June, but then it went -3 in July)… but that’s a different world then we’re living in now.
Now onto prices. Big month for the SFH median, or at least indicates last months dive was an aberration. We’re just a tick below $350,000. The average also rose over December, but only by $1000 to sit around $356,000. From this was take that the fluctuation of the median in the face of a fairly stable average that it was either an anomaly, or the middle of the market firmed up drastically. Maybe it took it’s New Years resolution seriously?!
The news was not nearly as rosy for condo’s though. You may recall last month my mentioning that we were on the cusp of retracting to ’06 price levels… we’ll we ain’t on the cusp anymore. We’re now officially at the lowest point since November ’06. The median took a pretty large MoM drop of $6,000 to $214,000. The average took a more moderate hit of about $2500 to sit at $221,000. Don’t be surprised to see a little bounce in these in the next month or two, especially in the median. When you see drops over 1% MoM, you often see a bit of a rebound, at least in the short term.
Finally, and as always, here are the hard numbers:
Sales* = 735
Since two years ago = +0.7% (+5)
Since one year ago = -16.9% (-149)
Since last month = -6.3% (-49)
Active Listings = 5,633
Since two years ago = -14.3% (-940)
Since one year ago = +15.8% (+769)
Since last month = -1.5% (-88)
Single Family Homes Median* = $349,900
Since peak (May ’07) = -12.5% (-$50,100)
Since one year ago = -1.7% (-$6,100)
Since six months ago = -6.3% (-$10,100)
Since last month = +4.0% (+$13,400)
Condo Median* = $214,000
Since peak (July ’07) = -19.2% (-$51,000)
Since one year ago = -3.6% (-$8,000)
Since six months ago = -7.0% (-$16,000)
Since last month = -2.7% (-$6000)
Residential Median* = $307,000
Since peak (July ’07) = -10.6% (-$36,500)
Since one year ago = +0.7% (+$2,000)
Since six months ago = -1.9% (-$6,000)
Since last month = +2.3% (+$7,000)
Single Family Homes Average* = $356,276
Since peak (May ’07) = -16.1% (-$68,124)
Since one year ago = -3.1% (-$11,471)
Since six months ago = -6.0% (-$22,703)
Since last month = +0.3% (+$1,005)
Condo Average* = $220,994
Since peak (July ’07) = -19.5% (-$53,385)
Since one year ago = -7.5% (-$18,012)
Since six months ago = -8.1% (-$19,337)
Since last month = -1.1% (-$2,460)
Residential Average* = $310,766
Since peak (July ’07) = -12.7% (-$45,373)
Since one year ago = -1.4% (-$4,511)
Since six months ago = -5.8% (-$18,968)
Since last month = +0.7% (+$2,269)
* Preliminary data, subject to revision














Kevin, thanks for the post.
I’m not sure if I’m just having a browser issue here, but when I view the charts contained in of webpage for this post, the last data point (for January) doesn’t show up. For example on the SFH prices chart, the last data point on the median series is a declining one.
But when I click through to load an individual image in a new window, then the January data shows up correctly.
As for the market itself, I assume the recent price volatility in the median price is at least partially a result of decreased transaction volumes.
And finally, looks like Edmonton now has our very own professional anti-rentite: http://www.antirent.com/
Thanks for letting me know, I cheated by copying and pasting old code and didn’t update all the links. Oops.
Nice link!
“I can easily arrange loans for people who:
* Are buying their first home
* Have zero down payment
* Have bad credit, collections and past bankruptcies”
Yup, it’s different here?! LOL
No problem, glad it was an easy fix.
That anti-rent website is funny for three reasons:
1) The “it’s different here” argument you mentioned
2) The Facebook ad copy that leads to that landing page (I can’t find the exact ad at the moment, but it read something like, “Paying rent can cost as much as 100 packs of cigs each month! Stop your rent addiction today!”)
3) If you look up the owner/advertising copy-writer, John Taggart, he has a degree in…Economics!
Come back to us with your statistical pornography. It’s been a long time, sweetheart.
Enter your comments here…
Ditto, you could argue this is more addicting. Is everything alright out there?
oops….I just read pornography…you get the point
Another blog bites the dust?
Test for Echo…